At DCS, Koffi Martin Odoh explored administrative liability in Francophone Africa.
Key Takeaway: At DCS, Koffi Martin Odoh explored administrative liability in Francophone Africa.
Koffi Martin Odoh, researcher at DCS (Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés).
Thesis defended in 2025 at the doctoral school École doctorale Droit et Science politique - Pays de Loire (Nantes).
Referenced in the ABES/STAR network, this thesis meets the rigor standards of French higher education.
Context and Problem Statement
Administrative liability in the legal systems of Francophone Africa, although inspired by the French model, displays distinct characteristics resulting from its integration into an often unified framework. This specificity raises fundamental questions about the autonomy of administrative liability in the face of the growing influence of private law. Studying administrative liability within the context of administrative law makes it possible to analyze how the requirements of public action and citizens' rights to compensation can be balanced. Jurisdictional dualism, observable in the legal systems of Benin, Senegal, and Togo, brings to light complex issues relating to the application and implementation of administrative liability.
The questions raised concern in particular the place of the administrative order in defining and enforcing this liability. The rising influence of tort law creates a dynamic that requires a re-examination of the foundations and mechanisms of administrative liability. This context also calls for legal reform, notably of full administrative litigation, in order to preserve the specificity of administrative law while responding to criticisms leveled against the dualist model.
Methodology
Koffi Martin Odoh's research follows a comparative approach, examining the French and African legal systems, particularly those of Benin, Senegal, and Togo. This methodology makes it possible to identify similarities and differences in the structuring and application of administrative liability. The analysis of statutory texts, case law decisions, and legal doctrine forms the foundation of this study. Particular emphasis is placed on the evolution of administrative law in these countries, as well as on the reforms proposed to improve the protection of citizens' rights.
The data collected includes analyses of concrete cases of administrative liability, as well as studies on the impact of recent legal reforms. This approach aims to provide a theoretical and practical framework for understanding the interactions between administrative law and private law, and their implications for administrative liability.
Key Findings
The analysis of the legal systems studied reveals that, although administrative liability in Francophone Africa shares common roots with the French model, it is influenced by local contextual factors. The often unified structuring of administrative liability in these countries reflects a desire for simplification and efficiency in managing administrative disputes. However, this unification can also create tensions between citizens' rights and the requirements of public action.
One significant finding of this research is that the influence of private law on administrative liability is steadily increasing. This trend raises questions about the real autonomy of administrative law in the face of this intrusion. The necessary reforms, particularly those concerning full administrative litigation, aim to ensure that the specificity of administrative liability is preserved while incorporating effective compensation mechanisms for citizens.
Case law plays a central role in rationalizing the principles and regimes applicable to administrative liability. The decisions of administrative courts help clarify the contours of this liability, while incorporating elements of private law that enrich the legal debates.
Discussion and Outlook
Reflection on administrative liability in Francophone Africa requires sustained attention to the interactions between administrative law and private law. Balancing the effectiveness of public action with the protection of citizens' rights is a fundamental issue. The legal reforms under consideration must not only address criticisms of jurisdictional dualism but also ensure that compensation mechanisms are tailored to the social and economic realities of the countries concerned.
The implications of these developments for the future of administrative law are numerous. The growing integration of private law principles into the field of administrative liability could lead to a redefinition of the responsibilities and obligations of public actors. Future research should therefore focus on assessing the impact of reforms on citizens' rights and on the ability of administrative law to meet contemporary challenges.
The comparative study conducted by Koffi Martin Odoh offers valuable insights for legal scholars and decision-makers. It underscores the importance of ongoing reflection on the foundations of administrative liability law in Francophone Africa, while paving the way for further research on legal practices and their evolution within a global framework.
Accéder à l'étude complète
Sources and Access
Koffi Martin Odoh. Responsabilité administrative et dualité juridictionnelle : étude comparée France, Bénin, Sénégal et Togo. Droit. Nantes Université; Université de Lomé (Togo), 2025. Français. ⟨NNT : 2025NANU3003⟩. ⟨tel-05382117⟩